Mezirow transformative learning pdf


This is where you would see an independent review of this chapter, but no one has written it yet. If you would like mezirow transformative learning pdf be the one that writes this review, you can e-mail me your review directly. If you suggest changes and I can make them, I will and then I will delete that portion of your review. Romanesque Architectural Design is an architecture company that specializes in 12th century architecture.

The company was started 20 years ago by three professional architects in their late 50s. The company is a middle-tier firm staffed mostly by retired consultants who are familiar with the architectural time period that the company caters to and younger full-time workers who strictly adhere to traditional architectural design methods.

In order to establish more profitable contracts, the company’s employees need to be able to use a new age architectural design software so that they have a better chance of having their designs accepted for more lucrative contracts. Most of the staff use traditional methods for drafting their designs directly onto the drawing board. Most of them retired from major architectural firms because they felt the firms were becoming too technically oriented. The company hired a consultant to give a training seminar on AutoCAD, one of the most popular architectural design software tools on the market.

During the first session, as the consultant introduced himself, he could see expressions of frustration every time he mentioned AutoCAD. The first task the consultant had the trainees do was to fill out a questionnaire. The reasoning for this task was to gather information on the trainees’ frame of mind when it came to learning this tool.

AutoCAD is robust enough to handle their specific architectural designs. However, the young staff members simply do not like the idea of using architectural software in their design methods.

During the next session, the instructor explained to the employees how he has had many trainees in the past who have felt just as they do now. He described how his past trainees’ comfort level rose dramatically after a minimal time of exposure to AutoCAD. To help reiterate this, the instructor displayed examples of his past trainees’ architectural designs created using AutoCAD.

Then the instructor showed that the tools in AutoCAD mimicked the normal tools that they use and tried to establish that the learning curve for AutoCAD is not as great as they thought. He also tried to establish how using AutoCAD would eliminate certain limitations that they encountered when using traditional methods, explaining how AutoCAD would help them create a more precise and robust design. Then he discussed how the click-and-drag components made AutoCAD as easy as using a word processor in some aspects. He then had the trainees work on simple examples using AutoCAD as a practice assignment.

He suggested that they should ask one another for constructive feedback or to report to him regarding difficulties and obstacles they faced while using the software. In the next session, some trainees stated that they had an easier time using the software than expected and that they saw the potential benefits that AutoCAD could have for future projects. The instructor started an open debate among trainees who felt they were becoming more comfortable using AutoCAD and the rest of the class, about how and why they have this assumption. As the trainees worked on more simple examples, the consultant could see their faces light up as they realized how easy it is to use AutoCAD.

To increase their comfort level, the instructor told them to create an original design using traditional methods as an outline and transfer their design onto AutoCAD. This was an attempt to help the trainees blur the lines between their old habits and new technical capabilities. After the post-questionnaire was turned in, the results showed what the instructor expected – trainees stated that they saw AutoCAD as a valuable tool they could use while maintaining the historical nature of their architectural design.